Feeds:
Posts
Comments

 

97 O how I alove Your law!

It is my bmeditation all the day.

98   Your acommandments make me wiser than my enemies,

For they are ever 1mine.

99   I have more insight than all my teachers,

For Your testimonies are my ameditation.

100  I understand amore than the aged,

Because I have bobserved Your precepts.

101  I have arestrained my feet from every evil way,

That I may keep Your word.

102   I have not aturned aside from Your ordinances,

For You Yourself have taught me.

103  How asweet are Your 1words to my 2taste!

Yes, sweeter than honey to my mouth!

104  From Your precepts I aget understanding;

Therefore I bhate every false way. [1]

Loving the Lord and meditating on His Word will:

  1. Draw us closer to Him.
  2. Give us understanding and wisdom.
  3. Make us desire to be close to Jesus.
  4. Will prevent us from walking in the ways of the wicked because we will hate that which is evil.

This Psalm contains a very basic outline for how we should walk as followers of Christ. By putting Jesus first and truly studying His Word, it will make us grow in our life to the point to where we hate every sinful desire, thought, and temptations that come before us. It will teach us to be holy and be an example to those who are without Christ.


aPs 119:47, 48, 127, 163, 165

bPs 1:2; 119:15

aDeut 4:6; Ps 119:130

1Or with me

aPs 119:15

aJob 32:7–9

bPs 119:22, 56

aProv 1:15

aDeut 17:20; Josh 23:6; 1 Kin 15:5

aPs 19:10; Prov 8:11; 24:13, 14

1Or promises

2Lit palate

aPs 119:130

bPs 119:128

[1]New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (Ps 119:97-104). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

This year my wife wanted to get us more involved with teaching our three children how to be thankful for God’s blessings and grace. She suggested that we make a Thanksgiving tree for Thanksgiving this year. She cut some construction paper into small pieces for us to write our blessings on and she made a jar into a drop box for the paper to be placed in. She used construction paper to make a tree that we could tape to our living room wall. The purpose of this project is for all of us to write down what we are thankful for daily and drop it in the jar. On Thanksgiving Day, we open the jar and read aloud the blessings before we put them on the tree. Our children loved this idea and it was a blessing to know how excited they were about exploring our blessings daily. We decided to make this our new holiday family tradition starting on the 1st of November each year. The main focus of this is not only to get them to be thankful during the month of November, but to teach them to be thankful everyday of the year for the blessings the Lord gives us.

1 It is agood to give thanks to the Lord

And to bsing praises to Your name, O Most High;

2 To adeclare Your lovingkindness in the morning

And Your bfaithfulness 1by night,

1With the aten-stringed lute and 1with the aharp,

1With resounding music 2upon the alyre.

4 For You, O Lord, have made me glad by 1what You ahave done,

I will bsing for joy at the cworks of Your hands. [1]

 


aPs 147:1

bPs 135:3

aPs 59:16

bPs 89:1

1Lit nights

1Lit Upon

a1 Sam 10:5; 1 Chr 13:8; Neh 12:27; Ps 33:2

2Lit by means of

1Lit Your working

aPs 40:5; 90:16

bPs 106:47

cPs 8:6; 111:7; 143:5

[1]New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (Ps 92:1-4). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

Over the past year, I’ve had several people ask me why I am reformed in my beliefs. I just wanted to give a general reply using some very basic reasons I became reformed in my theology this year.

I started pondering the Grace of God shortly after I left a local emergent church called NewSpring Church in Greenville, South Carolina. I always considered myself a non-Calvinist because I thought it was up to us to choose when we accept Christ. After sitting in this false church watching hundreds of people profess the name Jesus, the Holy Spirit started working on my heart about what I was observing at this church. I admit that when I was attending this Seeker Sensitive Purpose Driven Church for the Carnal Nature of Mankind that I was out of the will of God and rebellious in my life. I knew better than to be at this church because of my fundamental background, but I wanted change and a new way to reach people that the traditional church had thrown away. With this thought and logic, my journey into the Emergent Church began. Little did I know that my carnal desires would lead me to a place where I would become Reformed. When I repented of my rebellion, I took my family out of this church. I started pondering the Grace of God and how God’s Grace saves us. I could not get the images of people simply repeating the name Jesus out of my head. I could not find peace until I prayed and started studying the Scriptures concerning our sinful nature and the saving Grace of God. I kept pondering how repentance from sin was not explained and how I watched people being compelled to profess Jesus with little or no clear Gospel message being taught. I thought about the numbers game and how numbers were used by Perry Noble and his staff as a benchmark for God’s blessing. For months I kept digging and seeking God’s Will for my life and asking for a deeper understanding of my carnal nature and His Grace. I thought about the altar calls from other churches I visited and attended over the years past. I pondered and prayed asking God to give me peace and answers.

I am Reformed in my beliefs because:

I believe in the power of God to save and God alone (1 John 4:10). We do not seek God (Romans 3:10-12). God draws us to Him because we cannot come to God by our own merits (1 Corinthians 2:13-15 ,Romans 10:17).

I know there are more verses I could list concerning this subject. I just wanted to share a little about my experiences and why I am Reformed in my beliefs.

Baby preacher

My wife sent me a link to this disturbing video tonight. I can not express my feelings of grief, pity, anger, and sorrow that filled my heart as I watched this child perform like a puppet on a string. These people encouraging this should be ashamed. This is not something I find amusing because it is sickening the extremes some preachers will go to just to rake in the people and cash. These people in this video do not care how this will effect this child in the future. This is a mockery of the preaching of the gospel bringing reproach upon the name of the Lord.

1 But afalse prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be bfalse teachers camong you, who will dsecretly introduce edestructive heresies, even fdenying the gMaster who hbought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves.

2   Many will follow their asensuality, and because of them bthe way of the truth will be cmaligned;

3    and in their agreed they will bexploit you with cfalse words; dtheir judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep. [1]

 


aDeut 13:1ff; Jer 6:13

b2 Cor 11:13

cMatt 7:15; 1 Tim 4:1

dGal 2:4; Jude 4

e1 Cor 11:19; Gal 5:20

fJude 4

gRev 6:10

h1 Cor 6:20

aGen 19:5ff; 2 Pet 2:7, 18; Jude 4

bActs 16:17; 22:4; 24:14

cRom 2:24

a1 Tim 6:5; 2 Pet 2:14; Jude 16

b2 Cor 2:17; 1 Thess 2:5

cRom 16:18; 2 Pet 1:16

dDeut 32:35

[1]New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (2 Pe 2:1-3). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

Why Many Modern American Evangelicals Don’t Like Reformed Baptist Preaching

11/18/2009 – James White

Humanists with a thin coating of religion won’t put up with this for long.

 

Reformed Baptist Churches tend to be between 50 and 350 congregants in size, generally. Here is a contrast. A “church” with 16,000 in attendance. Listen to the message.


While I did not add the text to this video, the final verse provided says it all.

07:39:44 – Category: Reformed Baptist IssuesLink to this article -

This blog was copied from http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php?itemid=3630

Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?” And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning ‘made them make and female’, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” (Matthew 19:3-6, NASB)

No Such Thing As Same-Sex Marriage For The Christian

Apprising Ministries has long been covering an issue now—which also touches upon some others within it—that may well prove to be a defining one in our gelatinous generation should the Lord tarry. In articles like The Sin Of Homosexuality Is Different and Growing Gay Agenda In Evangelicalism I’ve been warning you that there’s a very dark and threatening same-sex storm right now approaching hurricane force and which, is currently only slightly off the coast of your own local church.

There is a very plain reason for this; with its open embrace of the egregiously ecumenical Emerging Church de-formation of the Christian faith aka Emergent Church—now morphing into Emergence Christianity (EC)—unless God sends revival, mainstream evangelicalism itself will soon stumble upon the same broad path followed by the now mortally wounded mainline denominations, who long ago cut loose their anchor of Sola Scriptura in favor of highly subjective Contemplative Spirituality/Mysticism.

If you actually make the time, you’ll see in Emerging Church To Transform Outlaw Preachers that the EC has now completely embraced a rather biblically illiterate, and largely gay affirming, bunch who’ve crowned themselves as Outlaw Preachers (OP). These OPs are rallying around gay marriage advocate “pastor” Jay Bakker, himself now fast friends with heretical EC spokesman Tony Jones, “theologian in residence” at the EC church of his quasi-universalist pastor Doug Pagitt.

But, as I previously pointed out in Outlaw Preachers Khad Young And Jay Bakker Don’t Love Enough their “outlaw” message amounts to antinomianism, a no-law distortion of the grace of God. And what makes these spiritual adulters strange bedfellows is their common antichrist agenda to try and convince us that the deviant lifestyle of having sexual relations with another of the same sex, i.e homosexuality, is a viable one for the evangelical Christian.

You can see a classic example of this in Andrew Marin And Phyllis Tickle where Marin, who is somewhere in between gay affirming EC OPers like “queer inclusive” ELCA “pastor” Nadia Bolz-Weber, and others around the EC taking a more “traditional” stance such as Dan Kimball. In that aforementioned piece Marin tells us Phyllis Tickle—the Empress of Emergence Christianity—“is leading the charge for the Emergent movement” and also introduces her “as a representative of the Church—capital C here”.

Ignoring What The Bible Actually Says In Order To Serve The Self

Tickle then scratches itching EC/OP ears by rehashing long-ago debunked speculations originally posed by what cult expert Dr. Walter Martin (1928-1989) dubbed the Cult of Liberal Theology as she muses:

the church itself is gonna have to come to grips with the fact that, we have changed,…we have evolved—the Law. We now admit divorce, our Lord does not speak much about sexuality; but He’s very clear about divorce. Ah, it’s the only thing He’s really clear about. And we’ve…managed to get around the divorce issue…

The same thing is going to happen with the gay issue; ah, it’s in process…the issue really is—absolute Sola Scriptura; Scripture only, and only Scripture. Ah, did God put a period at the end of Revelation, or did He put a comma?

I happen to think Tickle is right when she says, “The same thing is going to happen with the gay issue…it’s in process”; Tony Jones himself has said, This is the shift that’s taking place in evangelicalism, people. Take a look at what’s been happening just recently in mainline denominations who’ve already injested that kind of spiritual cyanide as Protestant Churches Shifting Toward Affirming Homosexuality, further evidenced by ELCA And Homosexuality and PCUSA Votes To Ordain Lesbian Lisa Larges.

But John MacArthur, one of those the EC considers anathema, was dead-on-target a few years ago when he said:

One of the big issues is homosexuality in the emerging church; they don’t want to take a position on homosexuality. The Bible is not vague, or obscure, or oblique about homosexuality–it couldn’t be more clear.

A homosexual will not inherit the Kingdom of God; that’s pretty clear. Homosexuality in Romans, chapter one, is a perversion that is manifestly–when it happen in a culture–when it begins to dominate a culture, an evidence of Divine wrath and Divine judgment. So the Bible is clear… (Online source)

So in closing this first part, we look quickly at a ludicrous statement from Tickle: “our Lord does not speak much about sexuality.” How pious, “our Lord”; for sure, Satan is very pious. But the opening text I used above flies in the face of those foolish enough to put self at the center; however, it is written in the last days — People will be lovers of themselves (2 Timothy 3:2). Notice carefully that, concerning church doctrine, Tickle takes the emphasis off what God said—“the Law…Scripture”—and instead elevates the fickle feelings of human beings—“we have changed,…we have evolved.”

Again, Tickle is correct…but not the way she thinks. A sad result of the seeker sensitive Church Growth Movement is that evangelicalism has indeed changed; it has evolved…away from God’s Word.

See also:

JAY BAKKER RECEIVES AWARD

HOMOPRESSION IS AT LEAST AS BAD AS HOMOPHOBIA

ROB BELL, PETER ROLLINS, AND QUEERMERGENT’S ADELE SAKLER

KEN SILVA, JAY BAKKER AND HOMOSEXUALITY

EX-HOMOSEXUAL FRIEND OF APPRISING MINISTRIES

BUT DO EMERGENCE CHRISTIANITY AND BRIAN MCLAREN REALLY LOVE GAY PEOPLE?

THE NIGHTMARE BEGINNING FOR MAINSTREAM EVANGELICALISM

*The above blog was taken from http://apprising.org/

hope

The other day while I was pondering the grace of God and the Doctrines of Grace, I ran across Romans 15:13 as I was reading my Bible on my Mac. I have been pondering and studying the Grace of God for several months now, praying that God opens my heart and pours more understanding of His grace upon me.

13. Now may the God of hope fill you with all ajoy and peace in believing, so that you will abound in hope bby the power of the Holy Spirit.[1]

Our total depravity really hit me when I read this passage. God, in His mercy and grace, gives us hope through the Holy Spirit. Even when we seem to have no hope, God gives us hope that leads to peace. God not only gives us salvation, but He fortifies it by giving us the Holy Spirit who gives us hope and peace. I had never really thought about hope from the perspective of our depraved nature and how we are not even capable of keeping hope. Not only does the Holy Spirit pray for us (Romans 8:25-26), He gives us hope when we are hopeless.

People without Christ can hope, but this hope rests solely upon them. The hope of the lost is built upon their works, their faith in their works, and the fruit of their works. This is the type of hope that does not lead to peace in times of trials.

Those of us in Christ are given hope by God; therefore God preserves us completely. I know this is a simple truth, but there is so much in this simple truth that we often overlook. I’m so thankful that God’s grace extends to all areas of our lives.


aRom 14:17

 

bRom 15:19; 1 Cor 2:4; 1 Thess 1:5

[1]New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (Ro 15:13). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

2 Corinthians 11:13-15

Ken Silva has another good blog about Rob Bell. I appreciate all the Mr. Silva does to stand up for the truth and contend for our faith.

Please visit Apprising Ministries and support this ministry:

http://apprising.org/2009/11/rob-bell-man-is-object-of-god%E2%80%99s-faith/

 

“These things you have done and I kept silent; you thought I was altogether like you. But I will rebuke you and accuse you to your face.” (Psalm 50:21 )

Emerging god But A Bigger Version Of Man

The following Apprising Ministries piece concerning Rob Bell, the Elvis of the egregiously ecumenical Emerging Church aka Emergent Church de-formation of the Christian faith—now morphing into Emergence Christianity—is adapted with permission from Rob Bell’s Abstract “Elvis”: A Critique of Velvet Elvis, a Critical Issues Commentary article by Bob DeWaay, pastor of  Twin City Fellowship.

Previously in John MacArthur: Existential Neo-Orthodoxy Denies Sola Scriptura I quoted Dr. MacArthur from his excellent book Reckless Faith: When The Church Loses Its Will To Discern:

Neo-orthodoxy is the term used to identify an existentialist variety of Christianity. Because it denies the essential objective basis of truth—the absolute truth and authority of Scripture—neo-orthodoxy must be understood as pseudo-Christianity… Neo-orthodoxy’s attitude toward Scripture is a microcosm of the entire existentialist philosophy: the Bible itself is not objectively the Word of God, but it becomes the Word of God when it speaks to me individually.

In neo-orthodoxy, that same subjectivism is imposed on all the doctrines of historic Christianity. Familiar terms are used, but are redefined or employed in such a way that is purposely vague—not to convey objective meaning, but to communicate a subjective symbolism.

The above is critically important background as we pick up the discussion to follow below; DeWaay has just finished pointing out that, while Bell himself doesn’t use the term “neo-orthodoxy” to describe his view of the Bible, “his position on Scripture echoes it.” DeWaay then shares with us:

The most egregious error in Velvet Elvis is found in the section where Bell offers many details about the nature of rabbinical instruction and discipleship in Jesus’ day. Much of his information about Jewish practices is interesting and accurate. But his application of the material is shockingly unbiblical. His error is to assume that since Jesus was Jewish and was a rabbi, that therefore almost everything that was descriptive about Jewish rabbis of His day is true about Him. This is a de facto denial of the uniqueness of Christ.

For example, in a section where Bell describes Jewish education and educational techniques, Bell misquotes a Scripture: “Jesus later says to his disciples, ‘Remember, everything I learned I passed on to you’” (emphasis his; he footnotes John 15:15).[1]  He then asks, “Did Jesus go to school and learn like the other Jewish kids his age?” [2] That is not the point of John 15:15! Here is what the passage says: “No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you” (John 15:15). The Greek said “heard” not “learned.” Furthermore, his learning was from the Father with whom John claimed Jesus pre-existed (John 1:1). Jesus was no typical Rabbi. (Online source)

One of the problems with what Bell’s preaching is that he often takes sources concerning third century Jewish rabbinic practices and then reads them back into the time of Jesus, as if these traditions were actually taught in the first century. However, this is to assume a lot; and in addition, DeWaay is also correct in that EC teachers like Bell so over-emphasize the humanity of Christ Jesus of Nazareth that they all but obscure His Deity in the process. Yet Scripture clearly teaches that Jesus was the monogenes (Greek), which carries the meaning “one-of-a-kind” i.e. “unique” Son of God.

DeWaay then continues deconstructing Bell’s mystic-based myths:

Bell assumes that Jesus’ relationship to His disciples must be also of the same sort that was typical between rabbis and disciples of that day. But that assumes too much and fails to account for what the Bible teaches. For example, in the narrative where Jesus tells them to “drop their nets,” Bell assumes that therefore Jesus sees some sort of ability in them: “Of course you would drop your net. The rabbi believes you can do what he does. He thinks you can be like him.” [3] That is a very man-centered interpretation that assumes that Jesus believes in innate human ability rather than His sovereign power to transform.

Because ordinary rabbis took the best students based on certain criteria does not mean that Jesus did the same. For example, the commission to be made “fishers of men” in Luke 5 came after a miraculous catch of fish caused Peter to say, “Depart from me for I am a sinful man.” This is likely an allusion to Isaiah’s call in Isaiah 6. Isaiah saw God’s glory and was convicted of his sinfulness. Peter followed suit. This was no ordinary rabbi that Peter encountered. (Online source)

No Matter What Judaism Was In His Time God The Son Was No Mere First Century Rabbi

Jesus was most certainly human; however, the Master was also God and, unlike you and me, His communion with the Father was not clouded by a sin nature. And God the Holy Spirit tells us through His vessel Luke that something preceded Jesus told some of His disciples to drop their nets:

It was at this time that He went off to the mountain to pray, and He spent the whole night in prayer to God. And when day came, He called His disciples to Him and chose twelve of them, whom He also named as apostles. (Luke 6:12-13, NASB)

And further, in His high priestly prayer Jesus informs us that these men were not at all chosen by Christ because of any innate human ability, but rather, were given to Him by God the Father:

“I have revealed You to those whom You gave Me out of the world. They were Yours; You gave them to Me and they have obeyed Your Word. Now they know that everything You have given Me comes from You.” (John 17:6-7)

With all of this understood, now you’ll be better able to see that DeWaay is dead-on-target as he Biblically topples the man-centered musings of Rob Bell:

One of the videos I saw of Bell preaching was about this topic of rabbis and disciples. After a very well articulated discussion of rabbinic practices, Bell came to the conclusion that the main point is that we must have faith in ourselves because Jesus believes in us. WHAT? Man is the object of God’s faith? Bell makes the same point in his book, discussing the incident of Jesus walking on the water and Peter starting to do the same. Here is Bell’s interpretation: “And Jesus says, ‘You of little faith, why did you doubt?’ Who does Peter lose faith in? Not Jesus; Jesus is doing fine. Peter loses faith in himself.” [4] That is very bad exegesis. Furthermore, Peter did have faith in himself later on and it was a bad thing: “Peter said to Him, ‘Even if I have to die with You, I will not deny You’” (Matthew 26:35a). We all know what happened.

Throughout the gospels, “great faith” or “little faith” had to do with people’s belief about Christ. For example, the centurion who did not consider himself “worthy” for Christ to come to him had a very high estimation of Jesus’ authority (Luke 7:2 – 10). He had “great faith” according to Jesus. His faith was in Christ, not himself.

According to Bell, what frustrates Jesus is “When his disciples lose faith in themselves.” [5] Bell makes a serious error when he assumes that when an ordinary rabbi chooses disciples based in his perception of their own abilities and potential to be like the rabbi himself that, therefore, Jesus must have had faith in the abilities and capabilities of His disciples. But this is not the case. No one will ever be conformed to the image of Christ because of his own innate human abilities. Bell’s humanistic teachings disregard the Biblical doctrine of human sinfulness and inability.

Bell makes it clear that we are not misunderstanding his point:

God has an incredibly high view of people. God believes that people are capable of amazing things. I have been told that I need to believe in Jesus. Which is a good thing. [sic] But what I am learning is that Jesus believes in me. I have been told that I need to have faith in God. Which is a good thing. [sic] But what I am learning is that God has faith in me. [6]

Is man the object of God’s faith? Here is God’s testimony about man:

What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; as it is written, “There is none righteous, not even one; There is none who understands, There is none who seeks for God; All have turned aside, together they have become useless; There is none who does good, There is not even one. (Romans 3:9 – 12)

In John 2:24, 25 it says this: “But Jesus, on His part, was not entrusting Himself to them, for He knew all men, and because He did not need anyone to bear witness concerning man for He Himself knew what was in man.” The word “entrusting” is pisteuo_ in the Greek, the word “to believe.” John 2:23 shows that this lack of faith that Jesus had in man is applied to believers. The reason for not trusting or believing in men was Jesus’ knowledge of the inner nature of man (anthro_pos, humanity). So most decidedly Jesus does not have faith in man.

We have to conclude that Bell is leading people away from the faith once for all delivered to the saints and toward a man-centered faith that believes in self as the appropriate object of faith and not to God Himself as the ONLY object of faith.

________________________________________________________________________________
Endnotes:

1. Rob Bell Velvet Elvis – Rethinking the Christian Faith, (Zondervan: Grand Rapids, 2005), 128
2. Ibid. Bell leaves this question unanswered for his readers to ponder.
3. Ibid. 131.
4. Ibid. 133.
5. Ibid. 134.
6. Ibid.

See also:

THE GOSPEL-LESS GOSPEL OF ROB BELL

IS ROB BELL EVANGELICAL?

ROB BELL ABSOLUTELY WRONG ABOUT SCRIPTURE

THROUGH ROB BELL “THE GREAT ENLIGHTENED ONES” TELL US MAN HAS DIVINE GREATNESS

RANK HERESY BEING PREACHED AT MHBC OF ROB BELL

SHANE HIPPS, CO-PASTOR WITH ROB BELL, SAYS ALL RELIGIONS VALID

ROB BELL, PETER ROLLINS, AND QUEERMERGENT’S ADELE SAKLER

Screen shot 2009-11-08 at 6.35.50 PM

Rob Bell is a heretic. There is no way to sugar coat the fact that this man teaches rank heresy that needs to be exposed by more Christians who value and love the Lord Jesus Christ. I am personally alarmed at the number of Christians who simply stay silent about heretics like Rob Bell and the men/women who promote him.

Here is blog from Pastor Ken Silva. Please visit his blog and watch the video. http://apprising.org/2009/11/the-gospel-less-gospel-of-rob-bell/

 

Yesterday, as of this writing, Dr. James White of the excellent apologetics work Alpha & Omega Ministries tweeted the following concerning Rob Bell, the Elvis of the egregiously ecumenical Emerging Church aka Emergent Church—morphing into Emergence Christianity (EC):

So you think @realrobbell would direct me to a listing of his sources for his “What is the Gospel” video? Esp. his claims about ekklesia? (Online source)

Below is the video to which Dr. White refers:

http://www.viddler.com/explore/GoodNewsTo/videos/12/

 

Earlier in the Apprising Ministries post Deconstructing The Gospel-less Gospel Of Rob Bell I included the segment of the Fighting for the Faith podcast where apologist Chris Rosebrough, Captain of Pirate Christian Radio, does a serious and thorough deconstruction of the gospel-less gospel preached by EC icon Rob Bell in the above video.

Rosebrough is right when he says:

Not only are there doctrinal errors in here; there are historical errors in here, and he’s engaging in something here called deconstructionism. This is a very, very dangerous “gospel” that he’s preaching. And I am not going to back off from my assessment; I’ll tell you ahead of time, this is not the Gospel of Jesus Christ. This is not the Gospel that the Apostles preached. This is something completely different…

I am willing, at this point, to stand by my assessment; unless I hear otherwise from Rob Bell, which I seriously doubt, I’m going to basically make the charge this is not Christianity. This is a rehashed liberalism, if you would; kind of an interesting spin on liberalism, the liberal social gospel, if you would. This is seriously, seriously, dangerous and heretical stuff…

And to make it easier for you to be like the Bereans ala Acts 17:11, following below is a transcript of the video in question:

Sometime in the 1st century around the year 30A.D. a movement was started by a group of Jews who insisted that their rabbi, a man named Jesus from the Galilee region in Israel, had risen from the dead after being crucified by the Roman Empire. They claimed that after His resurrection they had seen Him and that they had had conversations with Him and had eaten meals with Him.

And then they said that He had ascended to heaven, and that someday He would return. Now, the world at this time was ruled by the Roman Empire; this giant, military, global superpower, from England to India, the Roman Empire ruled the world.

And one of the most popular gods of the Roman Empire was the god Mithra. Mithra’s followers believed that Mithra has been born of a virgin, that he was a mediator between God and humans, and that Mithra had ascended into heaven. Another popular religion at this time centered around the god Attis. The followers of Attis believed that Attis had been born of a virgin; and each spring they gathered to celebrate the resurrection of Attis.

Which takes us back to the Roman Empire, which was ruled by a succession of Emperors called Caesars. The first one, Julius Caesar, when he died, a comet appeared in the sky and people said: “Well, of course, that’s Julius Caesar, the Son of God, ascending to the right hand of the gods of heaven.”

Soon after this Julius Caesar’s adopted son, Caesar Augustus came to power, and Caesar Augutus believed that he was the Son of God sent by the gods to Earth to bring about a universal reign of peace and prosperity. One of his popular propaganda slogans was: “There is no other name under heaven by which people can be saved than that of Caesar.” Caesar inaugurated a 12 day celebration of his birth called the Advent of Caesar.

Another popular phrase at the time, people would literally greet each other on the street by saying “Caesar is Lord”. So, in the first century, to claim that your god had risen from the dead and ascended into heaven; well, it just wasn’t that unique. The claims of these first Christians weren’t really anything new.

Everybody’s god had risen from the dead. What makes yours so special? Now, these first Christians believed that Jesus’ resurrection had implications for the entire universe. Their tradition had taught them that the world is broken and desperately in need of repair and that at some point in the future, God was going to put it all back together. Now, for them, this future restoration had nothing to do with leaving this world, it was all about restoration, the renewing and the reclaiming of this world.

And so they saw in Jesus’ Resurrection the beginning of this universe-wide movement to put it all back together. Well, this, of course, brought them into direct conflict with the Roman Empire, because remember, for the Caesars, it was all about Caesar’s belief that he was making a new and better world through his power, through his armies, and through his wealth.

And so when Caesar wanted to send out a message to let everybody know of his latest military conquest or his latest accomplishments, he would send out a royal pronouncement telling the masses of his latest achievements. These pronouncements were called in the Greek language “evangelions.” An “evangelion” was like a “gospel” or a “good news.” In English “evangelion” spells “evangelical.”

Now,these first Christians believed very passionately that the world was not made better through military power and political coercion. The Gospel they were living had nothing to do with using political force to force people to live according to your laws. For them, this Gospel was about serving the world, especially those on the underside of the Empire. For them, it was about serving not ruling.

And so they took this Empire propaganda term “gospel,” and they used it to describe this new world that Jesus and His followers were making right under the nose of the Empire. Because their way, the way of Jesus, was totally opposed to the way of Rome. And so, when we read accounts of how they lived, we read they shared their possessions, they fed the hungry, and they carried each other’s burdens.

Well, it’s because the Gospel for them was a whole way of life. A whole new world, right in the midst of this one. Now, Caesar had a particular word that was used for a city or a village or a province that worshipped Caesar as the Son of God, that acknowledged Caesar as Lord. So Caesar would conquer, with his armies, a new land and then demand that all of the people would confess “Caesar is Lord.”

If people didn’t, well, then they were crucified as a way of showing everybody what happens when you refuse to submit to the power of the Empire. But if a group of people did, if a city or a village of a region did acknowledge and worship Caesar as the Son of God, Lord, if they did accept Caesar as their savior, then the area became a worshipping center of the Caesar. These worshipping centers were called, in the Greek language, “ekklesias.”

The word “ekklesia” translates in English, “church.” And so these first Christians took this empire propaganda term “ekklesia,” and they used it to describe their gatherings, the ones where they confessed “Jesus is Lord”. Well, obviously, the way they were living it raised all sorts of questions for those around them. Who do you believe?

Caesar, who thinks that a new world, a better world, is made through his brut military and political power, by forcing people to do what he says? Or Jesus, who invites you to make a new and better world through loving acts of compassion and generosity? Caesar, who killed Jesus on an execution stake, or God, who raised Jesus from the dead? Whose way do you think is better? Who do you think is Lord? Jesus or Caesar? Whose kingdom do you find more compelling?

For them, the Gospel was an invitation to a whole new way of life. And they lived this way because they had this profoundly mystical understanding of what they were doing in their lives. They called themselves “the body of Christ.” And they believed that in their communities, in these loving, compassionate, generous, peace-loving communities, they believed that Jesus was present in a way that went beyond words.

So they’d invite people to join them, to eat with them, to celebrate with them, to suffer with them, and then they’d ask them, after they’d seen the hungry fed, the lonely loved, and the poor honored, they’d ask the people, “Well, do you think Jesus is here?” Or, more specifically, “Who do you think is Lord? Who’s making a better world, Caesar or Jesus?”

They believed that a church was a living, breathing display of a whole new world God was bringing about, right here, right now. Because some people, some people are fierce with reality, aren’t they? They don’t have to spout off about how they’re right and everybody else is wrong because there is something going on inside of them so powerful, so tangible, you can’t help but ask questions. You’re dying to know why they are the way they are. You want them to explain the reason for the hope that’s within them.

It’s because when you’re around people like this, you have this sense that you’ve in some way been with Jesus, and that is church. This group of people who by their compassion, their generosity, the grace that they extend to others, you find yourself believing when you’re around them, that God hasn’t given up on the world. That’s the Gospel. That’s it.

The Gospel is the good news that God hasn’t given up on the world, that the tomb is empty and that a giant resurrection rescue is underway and that you can be a part of it. And so, yes, this has a deeply personal dimension to this. Jesus is saving me. He’s saving me from my sins, from my mistakes, from my pride, from my indifference to the suffering of the world around me, from my cynicism and despair.

The brokenness I see in the world around me is true of my own soul, and so He’s resuing me moment by moment, day by day, because God wants to put it all back together. You, me, the whole world. And so He starts deep inside each of us with our awareness that we need help, that we need saving, that we need rescuing.

And then He begins to show us, step by step, what it looks like to put flesh and blood on this Gospel. Because we all fall short, and that’s the beautiful part. Broken, flawed, vulnerable people like you and me are invited to be the hands and feet of a Jesus who loves us exactly as we are and yet loves us way too much to let us stay that way. I believe. I believe because I see. I see the Resurrection all around me.

If people only had your life and they were asked the question: “Has Jesus risen from the dead?”, how would they answer? Has He? May you be a “yes” to the question “Has Jesus risen from the dead?” And may you come to see, may you understand, that you are the good news. You are the Gospel.

See also:

IS ROB BELL EVANGELICAL?

ROB BELL ABSOLUTELY WRONG ABOUT SCRIPTURE

THROUGH ROB BELL “THE GREAT ENLIGHTENED ONES” TELL US MAN HAS DIVINE GREATNESS

RANK HERESY BEING PREACHED AT MHBC OF ROB BELL

SHANE HIPPS, CO-PASTOR WITH ROB BELL, SAYS ALL RELIGIONS VALID

SILENCE SHANE HIPPS

SHANE HIPPS EXPOSED

//

prayer

I just found out that our friend at church has a rare form of mouth cancer. They shared this with the church and the church is praying for him. He has a wife and children. Please make this a matter of prayer. Pray that God heals him and works in a mighty way for His glory.

16. Therefore let us adraw near with bconfidence to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.[1]

 


aHeb 7:19

bHeb 3:6

[1]New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (Heb 4:16). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.

Older Posts »